You read forty depositions. Twelve thousand pages.
The contradiction that matters is on page 312.
From the Smith deposition — surfaced in minutes, not weeks
Inconsistency foundFlagged for attorney review
Deposition · Smith · p. 47:13
"I reviewed the report on March 12th."
contradicts
Exhibit 47 · metadata
Report finalized March 18th.
Six days before it existed.
Your call — keep or dismiss
You decide — nothing goes into your outline without your sign-off
Use this in cross-examination?
01 · Witnesses
Know every witness cold — before you walk in.
TrialMatrix reads every deposition, cross-references exhibits, and surfaces where a witness contradicted themselves — organized by issue, ranked by impact.
Deposition corpus · exhibit cross-reference · impeachment value
02 · Cross-examination
A cross-exam outline built on evidence you've reviewed.
Draft questions anchored to specific testimony. The system flags anything that isn't sourced before you export. Every page goes out carrying only what you've verified.
The order dropped. Every deadline updated instantly.
TrialMatrix reads each ruling, calculates what it triggers under the court's local rules and standing orders, and routes the work to the right person — partner, associate, paralegal.
Orders · local rules · team task routing
Not a chatbot
Not a chatbot. A litigation team that never stops reading.
Different agents handle different work — witnesses, deadlines, cross-examination — and share what they learn. Every finding links back to the exact page it came from.
Nothing goes into your brief or outline without your explicit sign-off. That's not a setting. That's how it works.